.jpg)
All Cars Movies Ranked from Best to Worst 🏎️
If you've ever sat down with your family to watch a Cars movie and wondered which one is actually worth your time — you're not alone.
The Pixar Cars franchise is one of the most beloved animated universes in cinema history, but it has also had one of the most uneven critical journeys of any major studio franchise. From the charming, nostalgic original that introduced the world to Lightning McQueen and Radiator Springs, to the polarising spy-thriller sequel that divided audiences and critics alike, to the emotionally mature and often underappreciated third chapter — every Cars film offers something completely different.
This definitive ranking covers all three theatrical Pixar Cars movies, from best to worst, with full reviews, box office facts, critical scores, streaming information, and the honest verdict on what each film gets right and where it falls short.
Whether you're a lifelong fan revisiting the franchise, a parent deciding what to show your kids next, or someone who has never seen a single frame of Radiator Springs and wants to know where to start — this guide gives you everything you need.
We're covering the films, the characters, the legacy, and the question everyone asks: is Cars 2 really as bad as people say? (Spoiler: mostly yes. But there's more to the story.)
Let's rev the engine and get into it 👇
💛 Enjoy great content? Help us keep creating: Donate to That Love Podcast
If you love this, check out: 10 Feel-Good Movies with Family-First Messages
The Complete Cars Movie Ranking at a Glance
Rank | Film | Year | Rotten Tomatoes | Box Office |
🥇 1 | Cars | 2006 | 74% | $462M |
🥈 2 | Cars 3 | 2017 | 69% | $383M |
🥉 3 | Cars 2 | 2011 | 39% | $562M |
🥇 #1 — Cars (2006): The One That Started Everything
Director: John Lasseter Cast: Owen Wilson, Paul Newman, Bonnie Hunt, Larry the Cable Guy, Cheech Marin, Tony Shalhoub, Guido Quaroni, John Ratzenberger Runtime: 1 hr 57 min | Rating: G Budget: $120 million | Box Office: $462 million worldwide Rotten Tomatoes: 74% Critics | 72% Audience Where to Watch: Disney+
The Story
Cars opens with the roar of racing engines and one of the most effective character introductions in Pixar history. Lightning McQueen — voiced with effortless charm and a well-calibrated selfishness by Owen Wilson — is on the brink of the biggest moment of his career. He is heading to the California Speedway for the Piston Cup Championship, tied for first with two veterans, Strip Weathers (voiced by real-world racing legend Richard Petty) and Chick Hicks (Michael Keaton, perfectly slimy). The opening race sequence is a masterpiece of animated kinetics — genuinely thrilling, beautifully lit, and designed with an understanding of speed and motion that makes you forget for a moment that these are cars, not people.
Then McQueen makes the decision that changes everything. Trying to get to California as fast as possible, ignoring his exhausted transport truck Mack, he falls off the vehicle and ends up lost on Route 66 in the middle of the night. A wrong turn lands him in Radiator Springs — a small, forgotten town on the old route that the interstate bypassed decades ago and left slowly dying.
Here, McQueen is arrested for destroying the town's main road in a midnight chase, sentenced by the eccentric Judge Doc Hudson (Paul Newman, giving one of his final performances and filling every syllable with gravity and warmth) to repair the damage before he can leave. What follows is the heart of the film: a slow, deliberate story about a young man learning to stop, look around, and understand what he might be missing in his relentless forward motion.
What Makes It Great
Cars is, at its thematic core, a deeply American film — a meditation on the specific loss of the Route 66 era, when interstate highways bypassed the small towns and communities that had grown up around the original road. This is not an accident. John Lasseter, who directed the film, has spoken extensively about his own cross-country family trips and the inspiration he found in the genuine history of Route 66 and the communities left behind by progress.
The film translates this elegiac quality into animation with extraordinary care. The production design of Radiator Springs — every building shaped like a car-related business, the rusted neon signs, the cracked tarmac, the way the town looks both charming and melancholy at the same time — is some of the finest environmental storytelling Pixar has ever produced. Walking through Radiator Springs with McQueen and Sally (Bonnie Hunt) during the extended night sequence, when the town's lights come back on for the first time in years, is genuinely moving. That a film about talking cars can produce that response is a testament to the quality of the writing and the sincerity of the visual storytelling.
The supporting cast is extraordinary. Paul Newman as Doc Hudson brings a weight and history to the character that elevates every scene he's in. When Doc's backstory is finally revealed — a champion racer who had a career-ending crash, was replaced by the next generation without a second thought, and retreated to Radiator Springs to find peace — it lands as genuine tragedy. Newman understood exactly what the film was about, and his performance carries the full weight of that understanding.
Larry the Cable Guy as Mater is the franchise's most discussed creative decision. Mater is loud, broad, and operates on a register of comedy that some viewers find exhausting. But within the context of this first film, Mater works — his unconditional friendship with McQueen, his absolute lack of pretension, and his complete contentment with his own life represent everything that McQueen is missing. The relationship between them is the film's emotional core, and the sequence where Mater teaches McQueen to tractor-tip at night, under a moonlit sky, is one of the most charming scenes in the franchise.
The racing sequences throughout are beautifully constructed. The climactic Piston Cup race is one of Pixar's finest set pieces — culminating in a decision by McQueen that demonstrates exactly how much he has changed, in a single action that costs him the championship and confirms him as the character the audience has been rooting for.
The Legacy
Cars ended Pixar's unprecedented run of Certified Fresh films and holds a 74% on Rotten Tomatoes — respectable but lower than the studio's all-time classics. Critics who found it lesser Pixar pointed to the pacing (the middle section is genuinely slow), the tonal inconsistency (the comedy is broader than Pixar's best), and the relatively limited emotional ambition compared to films like Finding Nemo or The Incredibles.
These criticisms are fair. Cars is not the equal of Pixar's elite tier. But as a film about community, nostalgia, friendship, and the value of slowing down, it works with a consistency and a warmth that demands respect. It is, on its own terms, a great film for families — one of the very best of its kind, and the strongest foundation any animated franchise could ask for.
The film also launched one of the most commercially successful merchandise lines in entertainment history. Pixar Cars merchandise has generated over $10 billion in retail sales, a number that comfortably exceeds the combined box office of all three films. Lightning McQueen's red paint job and Mater's gap-toothed grin are among the most recognisable character designs in global animation.
Where to Watch: Available to stream now on Disney+.
Shop This Film:
🎙️ Stream That Love Podcast — original stories every week: thatlovepodcast.com/episodes
🥈 #2 — Cars 3 (2017): The Redemption That Nearly Worked
Director: Brian Fee Cast: Owen Wilson, Cristela Alonzo, Chris Cooper, Armie Hammer, Larry the Cable Guy, Bonnie Hunt, Kerry Washington Runtime: 1 hr 42 min | Rating: G Budget: $175 million | Box Office: $383 million worldwide Rotten Tomatoes: 69% Critics | 67% Audience Where to Watch: Disney+
The Story
Cars 3 makes a conscious decision to pretend Cars 2 largely did not happen — and it is absolutely the right call.
Opening on the racing circuit, the third film finds Lightning McQueen at the height of his established success — a champion, a legend, a car whose career has defined an era of racing. Then a new generation of racers arrives. Jackson Storm (Armie Hammer, genuinely menacing in voice work that makes the character feel like a physical threat) is everything McQueen is not: younger, technologically optimised, trained from birth to be a racing machine, and utterly without the emotional history that makes McQueen who he is. Storm and his generation of next-gen racers begin dismantling the careers of McQueen's contemporaries one by one, and then they come for McQueen himself.
The film opens with one of the franchise's most genuinely shocking sequences. In a race, McQueen pushes beyond his limits chasing Storm, loses control, and crashes with a violence and a visual intensity that arrives suddenly and with real force. The crash is not played for laughs. It is slow, chaotic, and grimly realistic in the way that it depicts a high-speed impact — a tonal decision that signals immediately that Cars 3 is a different kind of film from its predecessors.
McQueen recovers, but the question of whether he can come back and compete — or whether he should even try — becomes the spine of the story. Assigned to work with a young trainer named Cruz Ramirez (Cristela Alonzo, excellent), he begins a journey that proves to be as much Cruz's story as his own.
What It Does Well
Cars 3 is the most emotionally ambitious film in the franchise, and in its best sequences it reaches the level of genuine Pixar artistry. The subplot about Doc Hudson — revealed through flashbacks and interviews with his former crew chief, Smokey (Chris Cooper, whose warm, weathered performance is a highlight of the film) — deepens the original film's legacy meaningfully. Learning what Doc's racing career looked like in its prime, and seeing the community around it, gives the film a connection to the original's themes that Cars 2 entirely abandoned.
The relationship between McQueen and Cruz is the film's genuine emotional engine. Cruz is a character who became a trainer because she was never given the opportunity to be a racer — a specific, resonant piece of storytelling about how structures of opportunity and gatekeeping prevent talent from finding its proper expression. Her eventual trajectory in the film is the most moving thing Cars 3 produces, and the choice it requires McQueen to make is genuinely complex for a G-rated animated film.
The Florida 500 climax — and the decision McQueen makes before and during it — is the sequence that divides viewers most sharply. Some find it deeply satisfying: a character acknowledging that the most important race he can run is the one that gives someone else the chance he had. Others find it a somewhat abrupt resolution to a film that spent most of its runtime building toward McQueen's personal comeback. Both reactions are entirely defensible.
What is not defensible is the film's middle section, which loses momentum badly. A prolonged sequence at a demolition derby introduces characters and complications that the film does not have the runtime to adequately develop, and the pacing problems become acute before the final act's recovery.
What Holds It Back
Cars 3 is a more interesting film than Cars 2 on almost every level — it has better performances, stronger emotional ambitions, and a more coherent story architecture. But it is also a film that feels like a more modest achievement than either of these qualities quite justifies, because it is working in the shadow of its own first act's promise.
The opening crash sequence sets expectations that the film cannot entirely fulfil. Having established a tone of genuine urgency and emotional stakes, Cars 3 retreats to gentler territory for most of its middle section, and the tonal whiplash is noticeable. It is a film of significant highs and significant lulls, and the final balance lands on the right side — but only just.
Chris Cooper's Smokey deserves a better film around him. The scenes at the old racing facility where Doc trained are among the finest in the franchise, and they feel like glimpses of a more fully realised story that exists just beyond the edges of what we're shown.
Where to Watch: Available to stream now on Disney+.
Shop This Film:
You'll also love: 10 Feel-Good Summer Movies That Never Get Old
🥉 #3 — Cars 2 (2011): Pixar's Most Infamous Misstep
Director: John Lasseter Cast: Larry the Cable Guy, Owen Wilson, Michael Caine, Emily Mortimer, John Turturro, Eddie Izzard, Thomas Kretschmann, Tony Shalhoub Runtime: 1 hr 46 min | Rating: G Budget: $200 million | Box Office: $562 million worldwide Rotten Tomatoes: 39% Critics | 54% Audience Where to Watch: Disney+
The Story
Cars 2 is a genuine anomaly in the Pixar filmography — a film made by one of the most creatively accomplished studios in cinema history that feels, in its final form, like it belongs to an entirely different studio.
The premise, on paper, has a kind of audacious creativity to it. What if the Cars universe had spies? What if Mater — the simple, warm-hearted, comically unsophisticated tow truck from Radiator Springs — was accidentally mistaken for a top-level secret agent and pulled into an international espionage adventure alongside British intelligence operative Finn McMissile (Michael Caine) and his partner Holley Shiftwell (Emily Mortimer)? What if the film was a globe-trotting thriller set across Tokyo, Paris, and London, parodying the James Bond genre with the visual vocabulary of the Cars universe?
It is, conceptually, interesting enough. The execution is the problem.
Where It Goes Wrong
The fundamental error of Cars 2 is structural. The film sidelines Lightning McQueen — the character audiences care about, the protagonist of the franchise, the car whose growth and development gave the original film its emotional weight — and makes Mater the centre of the story.
This is a decision that makes sense commercially (Mater is the franchise's most popular character in terms of merchandise sales, particularly with younger children) and almost no sense dramatically. Mater is a tremendous supporting character precisely because he exists in relationship to McQueen — his simplicity is the contrast against which McQueen's complexity becomes visible. As a protagonist, Mater's lack of self-awareness, which is charming in small doses, becomes the engine of a story that asks you to find it funny for nearly two hours.
The spy thriller plot is busy without being engaging. The villain's motivation — a conspiracy involving alternative fuel and oil-producing vehicles — has a political subtext that is too sophisticated for the young audience the film is primarily targeting and too thinly developed to satisfy anyone older. The Bond parody elements are competently executed but never funny enough to justify the film's tonal departure from the franchise's identity.
Cars 2 is widely cited as Pixar's most cynical moment — a sequel that didn't need to happen and made plenty of cash regardless of quality. The film grossed $562 million worldwide on a $200 million budget — the best box office performance in the franchise — which demonstrates something important: critical failure and commercial success are entirely separable in the animated family film market. Parents buy tickets because their children loved the first film. The quality of the second is largely irrelevant to that first-weekend decision.
Cars 2 gave Pixar its first-ever Rotten Tomatoes rating below 50%, breaking a 16-year Certified Fresh streak. That milestone — Pixar's first rotten film — still sits in the cultural memory as the clearest single indicator of how far Cars 2 fell from the studio's usual standard.
Is It Completely Without Merit?
No. And fairness requires acknowledging this.
The animation is spectacular. Cars 2 is one of the most visually impressive animated films of its era, with world-building ambition that extends from the lantern-lit streets of Tokyo to the Italian coast to the English countryside. The Cars universe's visual conceit — every structure, vehicle, and environment designed around the premise that this is a world built by and for cars — is explored with a thoroughness and a delight in absurdist details that is genuinely pleasurable to observe, even when the story around it is failing.
Michael Caine as Finn McMissile is exactly as good as you would expect Michael Caine to be in any role he chooses to take, which is: considerably better than the material deserves. His voice work gives the spy thriller sequences a gravity and a dry wit that briefly makes you think the film might find its footing.
The opening sequence, which introduces Finn McMissile in a pre-titles action sequence that directly pastiches the Bond tradition, is confident and well-executed. It is the film's peak. Everything after it is diminishing returns.
For very young children — under six — Cars 2 is largely interchangeable with its predecessor in terms of entertainment value. The bright colours, the racing sequences, and the physical comedy of Mater's spy misadventures work perfectly well for an audience that has not yet developed strong opinions about narrative coherence or character consistency. This is worth acknowledging. Cars 2 has a genuine audience. It just isn't the one Pixar's reputation was built on.
The Aftermath
The critical reception of Cars 2 had a measurable impact on Pixar's subsequent approach to sequels. In the years following its release, the studio became visibly more cautious about attaching the Pixar brand to projects that prioritised commercial considerations over creative ones — a caution that produced the creative recovery arc of Brave, Monsters University, Inside Out, and Coco in the years that followed.
Cars 3's decision to acknowledge and address the criticisms of Cars 2 — by returning to the franchise's emotional roots, prioritising character over spectacle, and treating McQueen's journey as a serious dramatic subject — is itself a kind of institutional acknowledgement that Cars 2 represented a wrong turn.
Where to Watch: Available to stream now on Disney+. (But perhaps watch Cars 3 first.)
Shop This Film:
🎙️ Before the conclusion — stream That Love Podcast: thatlovepodcast.com/episodes
Bonus: The Cars Extended Universe 🌟
Beyond the three theatrical films, the Cars franchise has produced a significant body of additional content worth knowing about:
Mater's Tall Tales (2008–2012): A series of animated short films — 13 in total — in which Mater tells Lightning McQueen outrageous stories about his supposed past adventures. The shorts range from "Mater the Greater" (a daredevil stuntman story) to "Monster Truck Mater" and "Tokyo Mater." They are broadly comic, made primarily for very young children, and represent the franchise operating in its most unpretentious register. Available on Disney+.
The World of Cars Online (2009–2012): An online game set in the Cars universe. Now defunct.
Cars Toons: Mater's Tall Tales (Disney Channel): The television broadcast version of the shorts, which gave them a much wider audience and expanded the franchise's presence beyond cinema.
Lightyear (2022): Technically a spinoff rather than a Cars film, but worth noting — Pixar's Lightyear told the in-universe story of the "real" Buzz Lightyear astronaut that inspired the Toy Story character. The Cars equivalent — a "real" Lightning McQueen story — has been speculated about in fan communities but has never been officially developed.
Cars 4 (Unconfirmed): Despite years of fan speculation, concept trailers on social media, and enthusiastic TikTok discussion, Cars 4 has not been officially confirmed or announced by Pixar or Disney as of June 2026. Jay Ward, Pixar's Creative Director for the Cars franchise, has stated that "Cars has got a life that will keep going" but has not confirmed a fourth film. The earliest a new Cars film could realistically be released, if greenlit today, would be 2028–2029.
Conclusion
The Cars franchise is one of the most fascinating case studies in modern animation — a series that produced one genuine classic, one notorious disaster, and one honourable recovery, and that remains one of the most commercially successful animated properties in history regardless of what any critical consensus says about individual films.
The original Cars is a beautiful, warm, and genuinely affecting piece of American storytelling dressed up as a children's movie about talking vehicles. Its love for its characters and its world is evident in every frame. Cars 3 is a flawed but thoughtful attempt to restore the franchise's credibility and emotional depth, and in its best moments — particularly in its treatment of Doc Hudson's legacy and Cruz Ramirez's journey — it succeeds. Cars 2 is a well-animated, commercially successful creative failure that serves primarily as a reminder of what can happen when a studio prioritises the market over the story.
All three films are available on Disney+. Start with Cars. Go straight to Cars 3. Watch Cars 2 only if the children are under six and specifically requesting it, or if you have a genuine interest in Pixar history.
And if Cars 4 ever gets officially confirmed — we'll be here to cover it.
💛 Support That Love Podcast: Donate here
🎙️ Stream That Love Podcast — new audio drama every week: thatlovepodcast.com/episodes
💡 You May Also Love
10 Frequently Asked Questions
1. How many Cars movies are there? There are three theatrical Pixar Cars movies: Cars (2006), Cars 2 (2011), and Cars 3 (2017). All three are available to stream on Disney+. There are also 13 animated short films in the Mater's Tall Tales series, available on Disney+. As of June 2026, Cars 4 has not been officially announced or confirmed by Pixar or Disney.
2. Which Cars movie is the best? The original Cars (2006) is widely considered the best film in the franchise by critics and long-term fans. It holds a 74% on Rotten Tomatoes, compared to 69% for Cars 3 and 39% for Cars 2. The original's emotional depth, the Paul Newman performance as Doc Hudson, and its meditation on small-town American life give it a quality that neither sequel fully replicates.
3. Is Cars 2 really as bad as people say? Cars 2 is the weakest film in the franchise and the first-ever Pixar film to receive a Rotten Tomatoes score below 50%, at 39%. It broke the studio's 16-year Certified Fresh streak. The main criticisms are its decision to sideline Lightning McQueen in favour of Mater, its tonal departure into spy thriller territory, and its prioritisation of commercial considerations over emotional storytelling. However, the animation is excellent, Michael Caine is genuinely good, and for young children under six it functions as perfectly acceptable entertainment.
4. Does Cars 3 ignore Cars 2? Effectively, yes. Cars 3 picks up with McQueen as an established champion without significant reference to the events of Cars 2. The third film returns to the emotional and thematic concerns of the original — legacy, mentor figures, the passage of time in a competitive world — and treats the spy thriller of the middle film as if it largely did not happen. This is widely considered the correct creative decision.
5. Where can I watch all the Cars movies? All three theatrical Cars movies — Cars, Cars 2, and Cars 3 — are available to stream on Disney+. The Mater's Tall Tales animated shorts are also available on Disney+. A Disney+ subscription is the simplest way to access the complete theatrical franchise.
6. Will there be a Cars 4? As of June 2026, Cars 4 has not been officially confirmed by Pixar or Disney. Jay Ward, Pixar's Creative Director for the Cars franchise, has stated that the franchise has a future but has not announced a specific film. Social media fan-made concept trailers claiming release dates in 2025 or 2026 are not official. Industry analysts estimate the earliest realistic theatrical release of a new Cars film, if currently in development, would be 2028–2029.
7. What happened to Lightning McQueen in Cars 3? In Cars 3, McQueen is sidelined after a severe high-speed crash in a race against next-generation racer Jackson Storm. He undertakes a comeback training programme with Cruz Ramirez and eventually makes the choice to give Cruz his racing number and have her race in the Florida 500 in his place, acting as her crew chief. He earns the right to race on his own terms — when he is ready — in the film's final moments.
8. Who is Cruz Ramirez and why is she important in Cars 3? Cruz Ramirez, voiced by Cristela Alonzo, is a racing trainer and aspiring racer who becomes McQueen's training partner in Cars 3. She grew up dreaming of racing but never got the opportunity. Her story — about how systemic barriers of access and expectation can prevent talented individuals from reaching their potential — is the emotional centrepiece of the third film and its most significant departure from the franchise's previous character dynamics.
9. What is the box office ranking of the Cars movies? Counterintuitively, the worst-reviewed Cars film is also the highest-grossing. Cars 2 earned $562 million worldwide, compared to $462 million for the original Cars and $383 million for Cars 3. This reflects the franchise's commercial momentum in the years following the original film's success, particularly in international markets, and the dominance of Cars merchandise as a marketing driver.
10. Is Cars based on a true story or real places? Cars is not based on a specific true story, but it is deeply inspired by the real history of Route 66 — the American highway that ran from Chicago to Santa Monica and was bypassed by the Interstate Highway System beginning in the 1950s and 1960s, leaving many small towns that had grown up along it economically abandoned. Radiator Springs is a fictional composite inspired by real Route 66 communities including Amboy, California, Tucumcari, New Mexico, and Williams, Arizona. Director John Lasseter has cited a family road trip along the old Route 66 as a direct inspiration for the film's setting and themes.
For more great movie and TV recommendations: The 20 Most-Watched Netflix Movies of All Time, Ranked
.jpg)
.jpg)
Comments